So when you literally asked "who", you just wanted the name of an organization, a meaningless label, and not any kind of information as to how that organization behaves?
No I was asking about how do would they measure the bias of the training data in the model.
You responded with "hurr durr bias testing bad because of one incident."
Now, I am 99.99% sure that you think that the "mainstream" news sources are liberal-biased. All of this news text and transcripts were used in training these models.
Wouldn't it be in your interest to measure how much it affects the output?
But who would analyze the AI for bias?
There already are anti-AI-bias organizations, so presumably those. They gave us results such as https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/22/tech/google-gemini-ai-ima...
This is a great response to something nobody was talking about.
So when you literally asked "who", you just wanted the name of an organization, a meaningless label, and not any kind of information as to how that organization behaves?
No I asked a sincere question.
Your brain is fried from being on twitter and seeing political hackery everywhere.
How was my answer not also sincere? Because you don't like it?
No I was asking about how do would they measure the bias of the training data in the model.
You responded with "hurr durr bias testing bad because of one incident."
Now, I am 99.99% sure that you think that the "mainstream" news sources are liberal-biased. All of this news text and transcripts were used in training these models.
Wouldn't it be in your interest to measure how much it affects the output?
or accuracy?